Current:Home > reviewsNew Jersey denies bulkhead for shore town with wrecked sand dunes -StockSource
New Jersey denies bulkhead for shore town with wrecked sand dunes
View
Date:2025-04-27 14:07:44
NORTH WILDWOOD, N.J. (AP) — New Jersey is refusing to allow a shore town whose sand dunes have washed away in places to build a bulkhead to protect itself, ruling that no one is in imminent danger.
The state Department of Environmental Protection told North Wildwood on Wednesday it will not give permission to the city to build a steel bulkhead on a section of beach where the dunes have been completely obliterated by storms.
That prompted Mayor Patrick Rosenello to say Thursday the city will move in appellate court for permission to build the barrier, which the state says will likely only worsen erosion from the force of waves bashing against it and scouring away any sand in front of it.
“Obviously we are very disappointed in the DEP’s continued lack of concern regarding shore protection in North Wildwood,” he said. “The department has failed to do its job and now they are trying to thwart our efforts to protect ourselves. Frankly, it is unconscionable.”
In a letter from the DEP received by North Wildwood on Wednesday, the agency said it visited the site and determined there is no imminent risk to life or property near the dune breach. It said a public walkway and a stormwater management system are between 100 and 160 feet from the eastern edge of the dunes, and that the nearest private homes are 200 feet from it.
“A bulkhead, if it were to experience direct wave attack in this location, is likely to increase erosion to the beach and dune system,” Colleen Keller, assistant director of the DEP’s division of land resource protection, wrote. Without careful collaboration with the state including the use of other shore protection methods, “a bulkhead could exacerbate, rather than alleviate conditions during future storms.”
It was the latest in a years-long battle between the city and the state over how to protect North Wildwood, one of the most erosion-prone spots in New Jersey’s 127-mile (204-kilometer) shoreline.
New Jersey has fined the town $12 million for unauthorized beach repairs that it says could worsen erosion, while the city is suing to recoup the $30 million it has spent trucking sand to the site for over a decade.
But trucking in sand is no longer an option, the mayor said, adding that erosion has created choke points along the beach that are too narrow to let dump trucks pass.
North Wildwood has asked the state for emergency permission to build a steel bulkhead along the most heavily eroded section of its beachfront — something it previously did in two other spots.
The DEP prefers the sort of beach replenishment projects carried out for decades by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, where massive amounts of sand are pumped from offshore onto eroded beaches, widening them and creating sand dunes to protect the property behind them.
Virtually the entire New Jersey coastline has received such projects. But in North Wildwood, legal approvals and property easements from private landowners have thus far prevented one from happening.
Although the last two towns required to sign off on a sand replenishment project did so a year ago, the project still needs a final go-ahead. When it gets that, the work will probably take two years to complete, officials say.
On several occasions, North Wildwood carried out emergency repairs, including construction of an earlier bulkhead without approval from the state. Shawn LaTourette, New Jersey’s environment protection commissioner, warned the town last July that unauthorized work could have more serious consequences if it continues, including potential loss of future shore protection funding.
___
Follow Wayne Parry on X, formerly Twitter, at www.twitter.com/WayneParryAC
veryGood! (76)
Related
- NFL Week 15 picks straight up and against spread: Bills, Lions put No. 1 seed hopes on line
- High surf advisories remain in some parts of California, as ocean conditions begin to calm
- Is 2024 a leap year? What is leap day? What to know about the elusive 366th date of the year
- The Empire State rings in the new year with a pay bump for minimum-wage workers
- A South Texas lawmaker’s 15
- Orcas sunk ships, a famed whale was almost freed, and more amazing whale stories from 2023
- Your New Year's Eve TV Guide 2024: How to Watch 'Rockin Eve,' 'Nashville's Big Bash,' more
- Reports: Former cycling world champ Dennis charged after Olympian wife struck, killed by vehicle
- How to watch the 'Blue Bloods' Season 14 finale: Final episode premiere date, cast
- Climate activists from Extinction Rebellion target bank and block part of highway around Amsterdam
Ranking
- House passes bill to add 66 new federal judgeships, but prospects murky after Biden veto threat
- 32 things we learned in NFL Week 17: A revealing look at 2024
- Will Social Security benefits shrink in 10 years?
- Aaron Jones attempted to 'deescalate' Packers-Vikings postgame scuffle
- Stamford Road collision sends motorcyclist flying; driver arrested
- Entertainment in 2023: We're ranking the best movies, music, TV shows, pop culture moments
- In Iowa, Nikki Haley flubs Hawkeyes star Caitlin Clark's name
- In rare apology, Israeli minister says she ‘sinned’ for her role in reforms that tore country apart
Recommendation
Trump issues order to ban transgender troops from serving openly in the military
New Year’s Rockin’ Eve 2024 lineup, performers and streaming info for ABC's annual party
Music producers push for legal protections against AI: There's really no regulation
See Martha Stewart's 'thirst trap' selfie showcasing luxurious nightgown
Spooky or not? Some Choa Chu Kang residents say community garden resembles cemetery
California law banning most firearms in public is taking effect as the legal fight over it continues
North Korea’s Kim orders military to ‘thoroughly annihilate’ US, South Korea if provoked
Ole Miss staffer posted fake Penn State player quote from fake account before Peach Bowl